Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Motorola One 5G's construction is newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola One 5G has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Motorola One 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments, a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lot bigger sensor.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.