Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. Even though Motorola One 5G is heavier than the HTC One M9, it's a bit thinner and notably newer. HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor.
The HTC One M9 features a brighter screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display. The Motorola One 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Motorola One 5G shoots better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
Motorola One 5G features a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC One M9. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the HTC One M9, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.