Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Oxford blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. The Motorola One 5G body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra features just a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola One 5G has just a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One 5G also has a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Motorola One 5G features a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos, a much better resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos.
Motorola One 5G has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola One 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola One 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.