Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11's 77.6 general score. The Motorola One 5G design is extremely newer than the HTC U11's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The HTC U11 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The HTC U11 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels amount in each display inch. Motorola One 5G takes much better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos.
Motorola One 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola One 5G has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
The Motorola One 5G is way more expensive than the HTC U11, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.