Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is a bit better than LG G8 ThinQ, with a score of 84.6 against 84.3. Motorola One 5G is a newer device than LG G8 ThinQ, although it's just a little thicker and heavier. LG G8 ThinQ features a more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
The LG G8 ThinQ has more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8 ThinQ features a little better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more RAM.
Motorola One 5G captures better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola One 5G counts with a superior battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G8 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G8 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG G8 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.