Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than the LG G8X ThinQ, having an 84.6 score against 82.7. The Motorola One 5G body is newer than the LG G8X ThinQ's, but it is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. LG G8X ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite smaller display and a little bit less pixels per inch in the display.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a greater memory for applications and games than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One 5G counts with improved battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola One 5G takes much better photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures, a much better resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G8X ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G8X ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.