Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 84.6 score against 81.3. The Motorola One 5G is a notably newer phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. Motorola One 5G counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery size. Motorola One 5G takes much better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.