Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola One 5G's 84.6 score. Although the LG Velvet and the Motorola One 5G were released with only a couple of months difference, the LG Velvet is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Motorola One 5G and LG Velvet feature incredibly similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a little lower 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit worse pixel amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
LG Velvet features a bit better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. Motorola One 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size camera sensor, the same resolution camera and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
LG Velvet has a bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola One 5G has improved battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.