Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Motorola One 5G, with a general score of 87.1 against 84.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer, a little thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola One 5G. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper display than Motorola One 5G, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite worse pixel density, they both have a screen of the same size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola One 5G counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola One 5G features a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.