Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Oxford blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 398.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a general score of 84.6 against 77.4. Motorola One 5G's design is incredibly newer, but extremely thicker and way heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better processor than Motorola One 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density. Motorola One 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a way more megapixels camera, a lot larger camera sensor taking much higher quality photos and a larger aperture.
The Motorola One 5G counts with slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola One 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.