Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 84.6 score against 75.8. The Motorola One 5G construction is newer, just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a display that is just as good as the Motorola One 5G one, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a same size display. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better camera than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, a 0.5 inches sensor and a 48 mega-pixels camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better video quality.
The Motorola One 5G counts with more storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Motorola One 5G feature really similar batteries performance.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola One 5G is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.