Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. Although Motorola One 5G is a better phone than the Galaxy A25 5G, we must note that it's also way older, a little bit heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better display than Motorola One 5G, although it has a just a little lower pixel density, a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola One 5G features an extremely better processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola One 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Galaxy A25 5G has a battery performance that's just as good as the battery duration in Motorola One 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.