Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A50, with a global score of 84.6 against 83.8. Although the Motorola One 5G is newer than Samsung Galaxy A50, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to Motorola One 5G's CPU, both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that's very similar to the display in Motorola One 5G, although the Galaxy A50 has a little smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite worse display pixels density. The Motorola One 5G has slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One 5G counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Motorola One 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a way better video definition, a much larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.