Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G's general score of 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a thinner and lighter phone than Motorola One 5G, although both were released only a couple months apart. The Motorola One 5G and the Galaxy A51 both count with quite similar processors, both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola One 5G and Galaxy A51 both count with really similar screens, although the Galaxy A51 has a just a little less pixels per display inch, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51's camera is very similar to Motorola One 5G's camera, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and video in low light environments, they both have a back camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the same camera sensor size, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality.
Motorola One 5G has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.