Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G, with a score of 92.9 against 84.6. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a bit lighter and a little thinner device than Motorola One 5G, even when both were only released 2 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW and Motorola One 5G have incredibly similar screens, and although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a quite inferior number of pixels per screen inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a display of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola One 5G and Galaxy A71 5G UW have quite similar storage capacity for applications and games, both of them have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and equal internal memory capacity. Motorola One 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.