Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is just a bit better than Motorola One 5G, getting an 85.2 score against 84.6. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body is somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola One 5G, even though it was released about 22 months before. Motorola One 5G features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite bigger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola One 5G has a little bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) and Motorola One 5G both count with quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola One 5G counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent bigger battery size. The Motorola One 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola One 5G also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.