Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G, with an 88.1 score against 84.6. The Galaxy F62 is an a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Motorola One 5G. Motorola One 5G and Galaxy F62 count with extremely similar processors, because although the Galaxy F62 has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G, although it has a quite lower pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a display of the same size. The Galaxy F62 has just a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than Motorola One 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a bigger sensor and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.