Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 398.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is better than Motorola One 5G's global score of 84.6. Despite of the fact Galaxy Fold is older and incredibly heavier than Motorola One 5G, it's body is still way thinner. Motorola One 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2520 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola One 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Motorola One 5G, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.