Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. Motorola One 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the Galaxy Note 5, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola One 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One 5G also has a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a better screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher display pixels density. The Motorola One 5G features a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a way bigger back camera sensor and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Motorola One 5G has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola One 5G is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.