Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 overall score. Even though the Motorola One 5G is newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition's processor is just as good as Motorola One 5G's CPU, they have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. Motorola One 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger sensor and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Motorola One 5G features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola One 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.