Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than Motorola One 5G, having a score of 86.3 against 84.6. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10e is older than the Motorola One 5G, it's body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy S10e features a little better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. The Motorola One 5G captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos.
The Motorola One 5G has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little more expensive than Motorola One 5G, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.