Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than Motorola One 5G's overall score of 84.6. Galaxy S20 is a incredibly lighter and thinner phone than Motorola One 5G, even though both of them were released with only 7 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit faster processor than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Galaxy S20 has as much storage to install applications and games as the Motorola One 5G one, both have equal internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photography, higher video frame rate and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola One 5G counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola One 5G, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.