Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Oxford blue | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is a bit better than Motorola One 5G's 84.6 general score. The Galaxy S21 FE construction is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One 5G. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a little lower pixel density, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola One 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola One 5G features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One 5G, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.