Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola One 5G, having a 95.4 score against 84.6. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a a bit heavier phone than the Motorola One 5G, but both are 0.35inches thick. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a little greater display density and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Motorola One 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a battery performance that's very similar to Motorola One 5G's battery performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot higher 108 MP resolution back camera and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.