Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | -- |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Oxford blue | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy S25, with an 84.6 score against 82.6. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
The Motorola One 5G has a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a more MP camera in the back, a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs and a much better video quality.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One 5G also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.