Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | -- |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Oxford blue | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Motorola One 5G's overall score of 84.6. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and way thinner cellphone than Motorola One 5G. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking display than Motorola One 5G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bit higher pixels amount in each inch of screen.
Motorola One 5G features a much greater performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a back-facing camera with a way better 200 megapixels resolution and a way better video definition.
The Motorola One 5G has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra and Motorola One 5G both have extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.