Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, getting an 84.6 score against 77.8. The Motorola One 5G design has the same thickness than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit faster processor than Motorola One 5G, because although it has less RAM and 4 lesser cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a better display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola One 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G also has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a much bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light environments and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola One 5G counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Motorola One 5G costs more money than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.