Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-09-18 | -- |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Oxford blue | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 score. Motorola One 5G's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy S6 Active, but it is much heavier. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixels density. The Motorola One 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The Motorola One 5G has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola One 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.