Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 84.6 score against 75.8. Even though Motorola One 5G is somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger number of cores.
Motorola One 5G has better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G also has a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Motorola One 5G costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.