Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 398.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Motorola One 5G's design is much thinner and lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both were released only a couple months apart. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola One 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot larger camera sensor and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Motorola One 5G has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One 5G features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Motorola One 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.