Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. Motorola One 5G is a somewhat thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were released only a couple of months apart. The Galaxy XCover Pro's processor is just as good as the processor in Motorola One 5G, they have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a screen that is just as good as Motorola One 5G's display, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, they both have the same quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola One 5G features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One 5G counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh. Motorola One 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a much more megapixels back camera, a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola One 5G not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.