Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 398.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Motorola One 5G, having an 88.5 score against 84.6. The Galaxy Z Flip body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One 5G, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Motorola One 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a much larger sensor.
Motorola One 5G counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One 5G, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.