Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One 5G's 84.6 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is newer, lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola One 5G. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Motorola One 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Motorola One 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One 5G, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.