Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 398.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is slightly better than Motorola One 5G's 84.6 global score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and noticeably thinner device than the Motorola One 5G, but it is notably heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little better performance than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
Motorola One 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels number in each inch in the display. The Motorola One 5G shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola One 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.