Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is just a bit better than the Xperia XZs, getting an 84.6 score against 77.2. Although the Motorola One 5G is a lot newer than the Xperia XZs, it's just a little thicker and way heavier. The Motorola One 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One 5G also has 4 more cores.
Xperia XZs counts with a display that is just as good as the screen in Motorola One 5G, because although the Xperia XZs has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. The Xperia XZs captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G, although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video and a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2900mAh.
The Motorola One 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.