Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 general score. The Apple iPhone X construction is thinner and just a little lighter than the Motorola One Action, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more more than a year before. The iPhone X has a little bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch of screen.
The Motorola One Action counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Apple iPhone X features a superior hardware performance than Motorola One Action, because although it has 2 less processing cores (although faster) and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone X takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same resolution back facing camera and a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone X also has higher video frame rate. Motorola One Action has longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola One Action, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.