Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, getting a overall score of 81.1 against 78.5. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Nexus 6 body is way older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola One Action. The Google Nexus 6 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a just a little higher pixel density.
Motorola One Action has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Nexus 6 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Motorola One Action features a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower video resolution and a lesser MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Motorola One Action features just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Nexus 6, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola One Action, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.