Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. Even though the Google Pixel is much older than the Motorola One Action, it's design is a little bit thinner and lighter. Motorola One Action has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Action also has more cpu cores.
Google Pixel and Motorola One Action have incredibly similar displays, because although the Google Pixel has a really smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Google Pixel shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Google Pixel also counts with a more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Action also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Action features better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2770mAh.
Google Pixel not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola One Action, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.