Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, with an 82.5 score against 78.5. Google Pixel 2 XL's construction is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action, even though it was released only 22 months before. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Action. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. Google Pixel 2 XL has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.