Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action, having an 80 score against 78.5. The Google Pixel 3 is an older phone than the Motorola One Action, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density. Motorola One Action counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One Action features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 3 takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3 also has a camera with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.