Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a bit better than Motorola One Action, with a global score of 80.7 against 78.5. The Google Pixel 3 XL body is thinner than the Motorola One Action, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released only 10 months before. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better screen than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size display, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a quite greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Motorola One Action has much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a little better performance than Motorola One Action. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a more MP back facing camera. Google Pixel 3 XL features a battery performance that's very similar to the battery duration in Motorola One Action, although the Google Pixel 3 XL has just 3430mAh of battery size.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.