Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Google Pixel 4 is a just a little bit lighter and thinner cellphone than Motorola One Action, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. The Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a better resolution.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Motorola One Action counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.