Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 global score. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is just a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action, and both were only released 2 months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size screen, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a bit better screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a better resolution.
Motorola One Action features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Action, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.