Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action, getting a general score of 82.9 against 78.5. The Google Pixel 4a design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola One Action. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen density. Google Pixel 4a has a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4a also has a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations.
The Motorola One Action features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a costs a little more money than Motorola One Action, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.