Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-08-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 5 body is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action. Motorola One Action and Google Pixel 5 both feature extremely similar screens, although the Google Pixel 5 has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower pixels density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Motorola One Action has a much better storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4080mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a more mega-pixels back camera.
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.