Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-16 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 304.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting a overall score of 78.5 against 77. The Motorola One Action body is a bit lighter than the Honor 50 Pro, although it is somewhat thicker and was released about 23 months before. The Honor 50 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a just a bit higher screen pixel density, a bit higher 1236 x 2676px resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Honor 50 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola One Action features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Honor 50 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.