Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. Motorola One Action's body is incredibly newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. Motorola One Action counts with a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Action also has a greater number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite higher pixel density. HTC U Ultra has a bit better camera than Motorola One Action. Both of them have a same resolution back facing camera, the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition.
The Motorola One Action counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola One Action has just a bit longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 17% more battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola One Action is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.