Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2019-08-16 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a general score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11's global score of 77.6. The Motorola One Action body is noticeably newer, but just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC U11. HTC U11 counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Action. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The HTC U11 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little bit higher pixel density. The Motorola One Action features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
HTC U11 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a 12 mega-pixels camera, the HTC U11 also has a larger diafragm aperture. The Motorola One Action features a little longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a little more money than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy HTC U11, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.