Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-16 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| $ 304.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the LG G5's global score of 76.1. The Motorola One Action design is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than the LG G5. The LG G5 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount per display inch and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola One Action counts with a bit faster CPU than LG G5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has 4 more 2.2 gigahertz processing cores. LG G5 takes clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same camera aperture, the LG G5 also has a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola One Action features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G5, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Action counts with superior battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola One Action is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.