Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Denim blue and Pearl white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 304.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 overall score. Despite of the fact that LG G7 ThinQ is older than Motorola One Action, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Action. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better display pixel density. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a much higher resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and faster video frame rate.
Motorola One Action features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG G7 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.